Structure of carbon's 'Hoyle state' revealed

Dec. 10, 2012 ? A North Carolina State University researcher has taken a "snapshot" of the way particles combine to form carbon-12, the element that makes all life on Earth possible. And the picture looks like a bent arm.

Carbon-12 can only exist when three alpha particles, or helium-4 nuclei, combine in a very specific way. This combination is known as the Hoyle state. NC State physicist Dean Lee and German colleagues Evgeny Epelbaum, Hermann Krebs and Ulf-G. Meissner had previously confirmed the existence of the Hoyle state using a numerical lattice that allowed the researchers to simulate how the protons and neutrons interact. When the researchers ran their simulations on the lattice, the Hoyle state appeared together with other observed states of carbon-12, proving the theory correct from first principles.

But they also wanted to find out how the nucleons (the protons and neutrons inside the nucleus of an atom) were arranged inside the nucleus of carbon-12. This would enable them to "see" the structure of the Hoyle state. Using the same lattice, the researchers, along with collaborator Timo Laehde, found that carbon-12's six protons and six neutrons formed three "alpha clusters" of four nucleons each. At low energy, the alpha clusters tended to clump together in a compact triangular formation. But for the Hoyle state, which is an excited energy state, the three alpha clusters combined in a "bent arm" formation.

The researchers' findings will appear this month in Physical Review Letters.

"It's interesting that a straight chain seems not to be the preferred configuration for the Hoyle state," Lee says. "A bend in the chain seems necessary. This work leads us to the question of what other nuclei have such alpha cluster shapes. These would be rather exotic structures in nuclear physics and open some really interesting questions regarding shape and stability. For example, can we have longer chains of alpha clusters? We are investigating these possibilities."

The work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy; the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren, and Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung in Germany; European Union HadronPhysics3 Project and the European Research Council; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Computational resources were provided by the Juelich Supercomputing Center. The NC State Department of Physics is part of the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

---

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by North Carolina State University.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

---

Journal Reference:

1. Evgeny Epelbaum, Hermann Krebs, Timo L?hde, Dean Lee, Ulf-G. Mei?ner. Structure and Rotations of the Hoyle State. Physical Review Letters, 2012 (in press) [link]

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_environment/~3/9OAlEsSSF3Y/121210124715.htm

shades of grey pittsburgh penguins record store day jennie garth space needle nashville predators king arthur

Hawking, CERN scientists win huge physics prize

GENEVA (AP) ? A Russian billionaire's foundation is awarding two special prizes of $3 million each to British cosmologist Stephen Hawking for his work on black holes and to seven scientists at the world's biggest atom-smasher for their roles in the discovery of a new subatomic particle believed to be the long-sought Higgs boson.

Yuri Milner's Fundamental Physics Prize Foundation announced the awards in a statement Tuesday.

Hawking is honored for his discovery of Hawking radiation from black holes "and his deep contributions to quantum gravity and quantum aspects of the early universe."

The prize money for the European Organization for Nuclear Research, or CERN, is being split among a scientist who oversaw the building of the $10 billion atom smasher and six physicists who oversaw two teams of 3,000 scientists each.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/hawking-cern-scientists-win-huge-physics-prize-115019154.html

What Is Labor Day jersey shore Pasquale Rotella Michael Clark Duncan michael jackson courtney stodden Ncaa Football Scores

6 dead as heavy snow hits Balkans

BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) ? Freezing temperatures and heavy snowfall have killed at least six people and caused travel chaos across the Balkans, with rescue teams struggling to reach passengers stranded in buses and cars in Serbia on Sunday.

Officials said four people have died in Croatia and two in Serbia as a result of blizzards in the region of southwestern Europe over the weekend, closing airports and roads and blocking public transportation in big cities.

People traveling in vehicles waited for hours on several roads in Serbia's northern province of Vojvodina, including the main highway leading from Belgrade to the Hungarian border, before rescue teams could free them from 50 centimeters (20 inches) of snow that had fallen in just a few hours.

A woman gave birth to a healthy baby in a stranded truck on her way to a hospital, and named her Snezana, or "Snow White" in Serbian, state TV reported.

By late afternoon, 660 people, including 30 children, were evacuated from stranded vehicles, Serbia's emergency authorities said, adding that army tanks were used to remove heavy trucks that skidded and blocked highways.

Ivica Dacic, who serves as Serbia's prime minister and interior minister, ordered all available police personnel to take part in the rescue operations.

The airport in Zagreb, Croatia, was closed for several hours Saturday, and some roads were closed because of high winds and heavy snow. The situation improved in Croatia on Sunday, but a warning against driving remained in place because of icy roads.

Croatian authorities said it was the heaviest snowfall in Zagreb in 57 years.

Authorities in Serbia and Croatia warned people to stay indoors.

Blizzards also hit Slovenia and Bosnia.

As the storms headed east across the Balkans on Sunday, Romania's army was trying to clear snowbound roads as the country voted in a parliamentary election.

____

Associated Press writer Alison Mutler contributed from Romania.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/6-dead-heavy-snow-hits-balkans-124529261.html

white house correspondents dinner 2012 whcd 2012 nfl draft kevin durant jazz fest zurich classic selena

The Self-Esteem and Beanie Baby 'Bubbles' | Psychology Today

As the parent of a Millennial and someone who writes about them, I think about the two ?bubbles??one lasting longer than the other with more profound consequences?that animated the lives of parents and children in the 1990s and beyond:? Self-esteem and Beanie Babies. Let me explain the connection. ??

During my daughter?s early years of education, self-esteem and its possible loss were omnipresent.? The ambergris of the time, self-esteem was both prized and fragile, the magic elixir that would keep your child safe from drug use and other dangers, make him or her perform better in school, enjoy enhanced popularity and friendship, and be genuinely happy for life.

Guarding self-esteem motivated heated discussions and as well as many misguided efforts: team sports in which every player got a trophy; teachers writing comments on schoolwork in pencil because ink seemed too ?permanent? and, in some places, banning red pens as being too hurtful and harsh; and ladling out praise for everything and nothing.

Criticism, even the constructive kind, was thought to be too damaging. As Dr. Arthur Levine, who has studied the Millennials and written a book about them, noted in an interview: ?This is a generation that was not allowed to skin their knees. They got awards and applause for everything they did, even if it was being the most improved, or the best trombone player born on April 5.??

Another parent of a Millennial recalls that ?the whole ?I?m special? movement was very influential in my child?s preschool. They all had a chance, for instance, to be ?person of the day.?? Traditional science and history fairs?that is, competitions?were under attack by parents who felt that ?not winning? (a softer way of describing losing which fit right into the zeitgeist) might damage their kids? self-esteem. In one town, a compromise was reached to deal with the fragility of kindergarteners? self-esteem:? a first and a second prize were awarded, with the rest of the grade ?tied? for third place. Put on paper, it all seems pretty preposterous, but that?s how it played out.

Parents didn?t invent the self-esteem construct, of course; it trickled down out of psychological studies and, as it did, it grew into a virtual flood of articles, news reports, and books (including one I wrote). Parents bought into it because it was the prevailing wisdom of the time and who knew what would happen to your hapless kid if you weren?t ever watchful?

If Millennials today suffer from FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out), their parents certainly worried about FAILURE?their kids? and their own?in big caps, all of it tied to loss of self-esteem. I remember one mother who dyed her seven-year-old?s hair ?to help her self-esteem? and the eight-year-old who came to school fully made up so ?she?d feel better about herself and more confident.? There were the parents who sent their nine-year-old son to a life coach to help build up his apparently fragile sense of self.

Enter the Beanie Baby onto the self-esteem scene. If you were a little girl, the Beanie Baby quickly became your heart?s desire, although many Millennial boys collected them too. For those of you who somehow missed the craze, Beanies were (and still are) soft and cuddly $5 plush animals which came with a tag that stated their names and ?story,? like Freckles the Leopard and Allie the Alligator.? More important ?even though many, many millions were manufactured? they were only sold through specialty gift and toy stores which only received a limited number so they were hard to come by.? And they were ?retired? from manufacturing so an enormous secondary and collector?s market sprung up, along with magazines and books devoted to them. Gobs of money were made (and spent). Beanie Baby hunting?finding the elusive new one and being the first to have it?became an activity. (Admission: I was one of those parents. I was on waitlists at stores in Manhattan and New Jersey and, no, I don?t wish to calculate the exact amount I spent on them.)??

The stage was thus set for Beanie Babies to be conflated with self-esteem?a perfect Millennial storm. I remember one mother, an executive in Manhattan who worked full time and had a nanny, paid $250 for the purple ?Princess? bear. She was a commemorative for the late Princess Diana and impossible to come by, and, yes, her kid was the first in the school to have it. A big self-esteem score there and a competitive sport that the Baby Boomers and their Millennial offspring could get into. (Admission: I acquired two Princess bears at $5 each some time later; my daughter sold one for something like $100 and was able to acquire the Garcia tie-dye bear she desperately wanted at a Beanie Baby convention. I?m not qualified to speculate on how that affected her self-esteem.)

And, then, it was over. The Beanie Baby bubble burst along with the dot.coms, production ceased in 1999, and that was that, and I, along with millions of other Americans, had too many of these things hanging around, collecting dust. As it happens, the self-esteem bubble was about to be pricked too, but it took a bit longer and, somehow, the message didn?t trickle down to masses?that is, parents and teachers? for longer than that. A 2003 report by Roy F. Baumeister, Jennifer D. Campbell, Joachim I. Krueger, and Kathleen D. Vohs titled ?Does High-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles?? made it clear that the ?you?re so special? approach was, to be blunt, not a very good one. For efficiency, I?ll quote from the summary offered by the authors:

• The modest correlations between self-esteem and school performance do not indicate that high self-esteem leads to good performance.? Instead, high self-esteem is partly the result of good school performance.
• Self-esteem has not been shown to predict the quality or duration of relationships.
• High self-esteem makes people more willing to speak up in groups and to?criticize the group?s approach?. Relative to those with low self-esteem, those with high self-esteem show greater in-group favoritism, which may increase prejudice and discrimination.
• High self-esteem does not prevent children from smoking, drinking, taking drugs?or engaging in early sex.
• Overall, the benefits of self-esteem fall into two categories: enhanced initiative?and pleasant feeling.

And then there is the ?ouch? statement: ?In view of the heterogeneity of high self-esteem, indiscriminate praise might just as easily promote narcissism, with its undesirable consequences.?

Gee, you think? So while high self-esteem does make you feel happier, it also may give you an inflated sense of your own abilities and self-importance. As it happens, Millennials didn?t need that boost since what?s called the ?above average effect??the bias in thinking that causes people to overestimate their strengths and underestimate their weaknesses?was already alive and well, thank you very much.?

So, other than inflicting them with FOMO, how the did the self-esteem tsunami affect the Millennials? Well, I?m not inclined to believe that the need for ego boosts is addicting as?Brad J. Bushman, Scott J, Moeller, and Jennifer Crocker suggest in their study titled ?Sweets, Sex or Self-Esteem,? nonetheless the finding that college kids prefer boosts to their esteem to sex, food, and even booze is pretty amazing, on the one hand, and not surprising on the other.

So please pause before you praise your child just for being. Have it connected to something he or she has done. As for the Millennials, I suspect that life experience will, inevitably, introduce them to some criticism, perhaps even written in red ink, which may help temper that ?I?m so special? view of themselves their parents foisted on them. Life, alas, isn?t conducted on a pass/fail basis.

And, by the way, if you?re in the market for some antique Beanie Babies, I have a bunch, at a rock-bottom price.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/arthur-levine-discusses-the-new-generation-of-college-students.html

Baumeister, Roy F., Jennifer D. Campbell, Joachim I. Krueger, and Kathleen D. Vohs.? ?Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles??Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol.1, No. 1, May 2003. http://www.csom.umn.edu/Assets/71496.pdf

Source: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/tech-support/201212/the-self-esteem-and-beanie-baby-bubbles

easter derbyshire the matrix oceans 11 ferris state hockey mary poppins john derbyshire

Inside the Future: How PopMech Predicted the Next 110 Years

Almost every day somebody posts the following on Twitter or Facebook: "In 1949, forecasting the relentless march of science, Popular Mechanics said, 'Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons.'"

It is one of those quotations?often plucked from online lists of similar nuggets?that people like to circulate as a pleasant reminder of how much smarter they are than those who lived before them.

The actual quotation, from the March 1949 issue of Popular Mechanics, goes like this: "Where a calculator like ENIAC today is equipped with 18,000 vacuum tubes and weighs 30 tons, computers in the future may have only 1000 vacuum tubes and perhaps weigh only 1? tons."

It reads a bit differently in context, no? Written at the time when computers were still huge mechanical/electrical contraptions, the article provided a pretty solid overview of the infant technology. Of course, what the article did not anticipate were two of the most pivotal inventions in human history: the transistor, which came into widespread use in the mid-1950s, and the integrated circuit, or microchip, which intensified the march toward miniaturization a decade later. The first fully transistorized computer, the IBM 608, hit the market in late 1957.

It weighed 1.2 tons.

And therein lies the dilemma for anyone who dares speculate about the future. Even if you're accurate in the near term?and PM's 1949 story was a respectable piece of prognostication?a prediction can begin to look naive or ridiculous when viewed a generation or two later. But we don't let that stop us. As a magazine about science and engineering, it's our job to explain how technologies just now coming into view might shape the future.

In preparing this 110th anniversary issue of Popular Mechanics, I've spent a lot of time leafing through our archives. It's pretty inspiring to see how well the magazine anticipated crucial turning points in technology?the impact of the automobile, the rise of mass aviation, the space program. In a 1932 article, Winston Churchill predicted a combination of telephone and television that sounds a lot like today's Internet. And when the Internet era finally did dawn, PM devoted a 1994 cover story to this new "Information Superhighway," calling it "the greatest social revolution since the automobile." Yep, that sounds about right.

One of my favorite articles was written by science writer Waldemar Kaempffert and published in 1950. Entitled "Miracles You'll See in the Next Fifty Years," the piece showed remarkable prescience, predicting the interstate highway system, automated factories, weather-forecasting supercomputers, and medical imaging devices similar to modern CAT scans. But Kaempffert's misses were as interesting as his hits. He envisioned a future in which "rich people in a hurry" would fly in 1000-mile-per-hour rocket planes, while ordinary folks would commute in the "family helicopter."

Sorry to disappoint you, dear readers, but we're still waiting on those. Here's the problem: Just because something is possible does not mean it is inevitable. Building a supersonic passenger jet (though not a rocket) became feasible in the late 20th century?and the Concorde really did cruise at Mach 2, or more than 1300 mph. But the high-speed fuel guzzler never made money, and it was finally pulled from service in 2003. Similarly, those personal helicopters (the subject of much hopeful conjecture in PM over the years) would be simple enough to build. But there is no simple way to fit millions of new aircraft into our urban skies?and the very idea injects new terror into the phrase "learner's permit."

One of the most fascinating things in the Kaempffert article is his depiction of domestic life circa 2000: Homes are built of metal and plastic; dishes, sheets, and clothing are all disposable; and, to clean up, the homemaker "simply turns the hose on everything." Even food would be synthesized from sawdust and wood chips and delivered to the home in frozen blocks.

It was a logical expectation. Midcentury America quickly embraced novelties such as polyester clothing, frozen TV dinners, and labor-saving dishwashers. Why wouldn't such trends continue indefinitely? Well, it turns out that while we all appreciate convenience, we also like a good home-cooked meal once in a while. Most Americans still walk on wood floors, wear cotton and wool clothing, and cook food that their great-grandparents would find quite familiar. One of the biggest challenges in forecasting the future isn't understanding technology, it's understanding people?and people don't have an unlimited appetite for change.

Perhaps the trickiest part of making predictions is getting the timing right. Some advances are slowed by social inertia or economic impracticality. Others suddenly leap ahead as a result of a technological breakthrough such as the microchip.

In making the 110 predictions in this special issue, we tried to balance our deep-rooted techno-optimism with some hardheaded skepticism. We turned to scores of experts?scientists, engineers, and many longtime PM contributors and consultants?to help us sketch the rough shape of the next century. We canvassed our experts about the nature of future changes and when key breakthroughs might occur. How did we do? There's only one way to know for sure: Check back with us in 110 years.

Meet the PM Brain Trust

It takes a lot of brainpower to map out the future. To make sure we had an abundant supply, we assembled a team of experts?fondly known as the PM Brain Trust?to help us with this story. In addition to completing a 41-question survey, they shared their comments. In the following pages, you'll find 15 of their predictions. Before we move on, let us thank them each by name.

Michael Belfiore Journalist/author, Rocketeers

Karen J. Brewer Chemistry professor, Virginia Tech

Shawn Carlson Founder, Society for Amateur Scientists

Sean Carroll Theoretical physicist, Caltech

David E. Cole Chairman emeritus, Center for Automotive Research

George Davison CEO and founder, Davison Intl.

Esther Dyson Entrepreneur

Shawn Frayne Inventor/president, Humdinger Wind Energy

Stuart Harshbarger Co-founder and chief technology officer, Contineo Robotics LLC

Jamie Hyneman Host, MythBusters

Thomas D. Jones NASA astronaut and planetary scientist

Dr. Ken Kamler Microsurgeon and director, The Explorers Club

John Maeda President, Rhode Island School of Design

Annalee Newitz Editor-in-chief, io9.com

Michael Ravine Advanced projects manager, Malin Space Science Systems

Glenn Harlan Reynolds Law professor, University of Tennessee and author, Instapundit

Adam Savage Host, MythBusters

Gavin A. SchmidtClimatologist, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies

Seth Shostak Senior astronomer, SETI Institute

Steven D. Weiner Director of engineering sciences, Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.

Daniel H. Wilson Roboticist and author, Robopocalypse

Jeff Wise Author, Extreme Fear

Source: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/news/inside-the-future-how-popmech-predicted-the-next-110-years-14831802?src=rss

evan mathis staff sgt. robert bales jason russell norfolk state st patrick s day parade duke invisible children

SAM celebrates the first day that same-sex couples can marry in Washington state...

SAM celebrates the first day that same-sex couples can marry in Washington state, by giving EVERY couple a special deal: buy one ticket to see Elles: Women Artists from the Centre Pompidou, Paris and get a second one free! It?s the perfect day to bring somebody special with you to see the exhibition! Just mention "Couples" at the ticketing desk!

http://seattleartmuseum.org/elles/

Source: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151157707887727&set=a.201209492726.140970.22964827726&type=1

brock lesnar kentucky jayhawks wwe wrestlemania oakland shooting mega millions winning numbers autism speaks

Software FOREX? What is the best way to invest 1000$ when you ...

is stocks or forex a rational option to invest such a little money if i have one hour of free time? thanks for your help in advance, guys.
I am willing to have a 50% risk of losing it and may use it after one year. what options does that leave me with?

my advice would be take the investools course and traing, there system will teach you how to make incredible gains in up or down markets. forget B.S. returns from financial planners that will just put you money in a mutual fund. They teach you the technical indicators that proffesionals use. It costs about $2000 then their site costs a few hundred a year, but no site compares with their tools. here?s the link?at this link I gave you, scroll down to the left there are a few demos.

http://www.investools.com/toolbox/index.jsp

To prove how good investools is?.Look at the stock chart of theri own stock which the symbol is IEDU?. The stock went from $1 to $14 dollars in like 3 years. That?s how good theri system is. Here is the link??

http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=IEDU&p=D&yr=3&mn=0&dy=0&i=t82330920302&r=9384

Now if you can?t afford it yet, that?s okay. keep it in mind for the future.

you can turn that $1000 into $100,000 in one year by trading stocks, not investing. Investing is long term. The stock market is open from 9:30 am to 4:00 pm eastern, everyday. There are stocks that go up 10%, 30%, or even double every day. I work everyday in the afternoon, so I only have from opening bell at 9:30 to 11:00 to trade stocks. The stocks that make the biggest moves everday are low priced NASDAQ stocks. $5 or under.

First you need to open an online broker. I use Scottrade.com and opened mine with only $500. I just filled out the required info at their site, and the next day wired transfered the money to them at ll:00 am, and by 1 pm in the afternoon I was able to make my first trade. It?s that easy. Anyone is fine. There are two types of accounts, Cash or Margin. If you only have $1000 you can only open a Cash account. With cash accounts, when you sell a stock, you have to wait 3 days for the money to settle before you can buy another stock with that money you got from selling. So When you you first start, you won?t be able to make trades everyday because you only have $1000 and will have to wait three days.

Now about trading stocks and finding them?..

Stocks react to PR?s (Press Releases) . So in the morning find the stocks that are moving because of good news released that morning, and get in the stock as they are going up, and after you made 5, 10, 15, or what ever percent sell it quickly to lock you profit and forget about the stock. Wait for you funds to settle in three days, and trade again.

Now how do you find the cheap NASDAQ stocks the move the best every morning to good news ? Good question

The best Trading platform for penny stocks is Microcaptrade. I?ll give you the link.

http://www.microcaptrade.com/ind/platform_features-features.html

All you have to do is look at the top 400 tool at microcaptrade before the market opens. Microcaptrade also tracks pinksheet and OTC stocks, but stay away from those, they are scam stocks and too risky. They don?t meet the reqirements for the NASDAQ, NYSE, or AMEX , the three major exchanges. So at the top of the Microcaptrades top 400, uncheck the boxes at the top that say pinks and otc: bb , that way only the NASDAQ stocks will be tracked. then click on the column heading that says trades. That will sort all the stocks by the # of trades. That way you will see what stocks are getting the most buys and sells that day. And all the way to the left there is a column header that says news, if there is a number in that row, that means there was a PR that morning (news). Look at the link I gave you and you can look at the platform. Also microcaptrade has a news tool, that show every single PR that day for either OTC:BB, Pinksheet, or NASDAQ stocks. Once again, just unched the pink and otc boxes , show that you only see the NASDAQ news. the reason I say stay away from pink sheet and otc stocks is that the can go up 50% or double or tripple in one day, or sometimes go up 1000% in a few days to a week, but they can also drop quickly and go back to where they started or below. Another reason is you have to use limit orders and the price changes so much you have to keep changes you limit prices and it?s tricky just stay away. With real stocks like NASDAQ, NYSE, Or AMEX stocks, you can use MARKET ORDERS, that means all you have to do is put in the stock symbol and the number of shares, and the order goes through in seconds. To place a trade with $1000, you would subtract the commision. Then divide the money buy the current price of the stock. I use Scottrade. they charge $7 per trade. To make it easy say it?s $10. You would subtract 1000 by 10 which is $990. that?s what you have to work with. If the current price is at $10 the divide you money by that. That wold give you 99. So you have enough money to buy 99 shares. You would just go to scottrade and put buy 100 shares of xxxx or what ever the sybol is.

The best message board for day traders is the lion. Most people who post there are full time traders that trade for a living?.just read their posts and you can make money. Read the wall street pit board at the lion. here is the link?

http://www.thelion.com/

IHere are some other stock and financial sites in general to get you to learn the basics.

Yahoo finance?type in any symbol ? I put in apple?s symbol

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=aapl

Barchart

http://www2.barchart.com/support/sitemap.asp

this link will show you the stocks with the most percent gainers everyday?.You can make these gains everyday?.forget 10% a year in a mutual fund

http://www2.barchart.com/padvance.asp

most people into investin and trading subscribe to IBD (Investors business daily)

http://www.investors.com/

Investools is awesome?.take a free seminar and check it out, you can double you money every year with their methods?which is basicly buy good stocks like google and apple when they go above their charts look good, and sell when the look bad. no need to buy and hold and make something like say 15% a year, when you can buy low and sell high and make say 75% a year on the same stocks by buying and selling it. Here?s their link

http://www.investools.com/

If you have question about any topic in finance or investing, or daytrading?.here is the best site?.just put in the keywords of your question

http://www.investopedia.com

Tags: best trading, make money, best trading platform, E Trade, time trader, day trader, online broker

Source: http://www.software-forex.org/forex-indicators/what-is-the-best-way-to-invest-1000-when-you-have-one-hour-time-daily

Snooki Baby terrell owens terrell owens neil armstrong little league world series us open tennis us open tennis